University of Kabianga Repository

Supplier development, integration and procurement performance of steel manufacturing firms in Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gudda, Kevin
dc.contributor.author Keitany, Pauline Jeruto
dc.contributor.author Ombok, Maurice
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-15T09:24:38Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-15T09:24:38Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.citation Gudda, K., Keitany, P. J., & Ombok, M. (2023). Supplier development, integration and procurement performance of steel manufacturing firms in Kenya. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2656-3355
dc.identifier.uri http://ir-library.kabianga.ac.ke/handle/123456789/815
dc.description Article Journal on Supplier development, integration and procurement performance of steel manufacturing firms in Kenya en_US
dc.description.abstract Purpose: This study examined how supplier integration moderates the relationship between supplier development and procurement performance in steel manufacturing firms within Nairobi City County, Kenya. Research methodology: A mixed method research design and positivism approach were adopted for this study. A census with a population of 360 employees within the 10 steel firms in Nairobi City County, Kenya was conducted. Primary data was collected using questionnaires. The collected data was analyzed using SPSS V.26.0 and SmartPLS 4.0 programs to test for both direct and joint effects of the variables. Results: The results of the study revealed that supplier selection (β=0.50, t=8.309, p<0.05), supplier partnership (β=0.136, t=2.872, p<0.05), and supplier evaluation (β=0.127, t=2.884, p<0.05) have a positive and significant impact on the procurement performance. On the other hand supplier training (β= -0.086, t=1.683, p>0.05) had an insignificant effect on procurement performance. The study findings also show that supplier integration had significant negative effects on: supplier partnership (β= -0.497, t=10.702, p<0.05), supplier evaluation (β= -0.097, t=2.323, p<0.05) and supplier training (β=0.264, t=4.988, p<0.05). However, the results indicate that supplier integration has no significant impact on supplier selection (β= -0.079, t=1.108, p>0.05). The indirect effect analysis showed that supplier integration (β= -0.142, t=1.108, p<0.05) has a negative and significant impact on procurement performance. Contributions: Steel manufacturing firms need to emphasize the significance of supplier selection, efficient communication and collaboration with suppliers, and continuous performance monitoring and risk management to improve procurement performance. These factors enhance the reliability, quality, and cost-effectiveness of their procurement operations, resulting in better outcomes and a competitive advantage in their respective markets. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management (IJFAM) en_US
dc.subject Supplier selection en_US
dc.subject Supplier evaluation en_US
dc.subject Supplier training en_US
dc.subject Supplier partnership en_US
dc.subject Supplier integration en_US
dc.title Supplier development, integration and procurement performance of steel manufacturing firms in Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account