Abstract:
As Kenyans headed to elections in August 2022 which characteristically mirrored political alignments and
re-alignments, it elicited mixed recitations and tensions among the political class. The two frontrunners,
Raila Odinga and William Ruto saw a loss as a great threat to their political and economic interests. This
was propounded by the nature of Kenyan elections that is always a high stakes affair since the political class
is eager to protect their careers and business interests. The previously witnessed social tensions seemed low
compared to the previous year’s elections that may be attributed to changes in political dynamics where the
political elites have relatively resorted to political agendas. The issue based politics however does not
elusively promise peaceful transition, but creates optimism. Despite the efforts for peaceful elections by the
political elite, the intra-elite tensions possess a threat to the outcome of the vote. A highly prime scenario is
the increasing verbal attacks on one another by the political class as election date drew nearer that ethnicity
and economic cleavages could drive voters into unrest; a situation that could be easily overcome by
conceding defeat. The already witnessed public pronouncements by the top presidential contenders to
accepting the poll results and the public view of the Kenyan Judiciary being regarded one of the best in
Africa creates an avenue for contestation where candidates unhappy with the election outcome resort to in
limiting the possible threats of violence. The interdependent institutions at the election period have to
support each other while maintaining strict neutrality. Both internal and external actors have and should
even work harder to address potential sourcesof unrest as the country moves closer to transition. Kenya is
currently the main transport and commercial hub in the East African region hence any form of violence
impacts negatively much parts of the region. Use of social media sites contribute positively in political
passage of information despite the risk of misinformation. It is therefore postulated that government
institutions, civil society and political elitesinfluence on their supporters will greatly sway their actions for
stability, good economy, education, and external linkages afterwards.
