The Fallacies of the Professional Educators (Philosophical & Psychological Perspectives)
dc.contributor.author | Surum, Janet | |
dc.contributor.author | Kauka, Elvis Omondi | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-28T10:01:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-28T10:01:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.description | Journal on Fallacies of the Professional Educators (Philosophical & Psychological Perspectives) | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This Essay sought to examine the three cardinal sins of Professional Educators. These sins of omission and commission are herein referred to as Educational Fallacies of the positivistic nature, the evaluation policy fallacy and the fallacy of the Romantic nature. These fallacies tend to lay undue emphasis on either the Cognitive dimensions of Learning or Affective domain of learning, yet Education is not a disjunctive activity, it is a conjunctive activity(a both-and kind of process). Real Education is not an exclusive discriminatory activity as propounded by the fallacies; instead it is an inclusive liberal process. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Surum, J., & Kauka, E. O. The Fallacies of the Professional Educators (Philosophical & Psychological Perspectives). | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2454-6186 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ir-library.kabianga.ac.ke/handle/123456789/671 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS) | en_US |
dc.subject | Fallacies | en_US |
dc.subject | Professional Educators | en_US |
dc.title | The Fallacies of the Professional Educators (Philosophical & Psychological Perspectives) | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |