The Fallacies of the Professional Educators (Philosophical & Psychological Perspectives)

dc.contributor.authorSurum, Janet
dc.contributor.authorKauka, Elvis Omondi
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-28T10:01:26Z
dc.date.available2023-08-28T10:01:26Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionJournal on Fallacies of the Professional Educators (Philosophical & Psychological Perspectives)en_US
dc.description.abstractThis Essay sought to examine the three cardinal sins of Professional Educators. These sins of omission and commission are herein referred to as Educational Fallacies of the positivistic nature, the evaluation policy fallacy and the fallacy of the Romantic nature. These fallacies tend to lay undue emphasis on either the Cognitive dimensions of Learning or Affective domain of learning, yet Education is not a disjunctive activity, it is a conjunctive activity(a both-and kind of process). Real Education is not an exclusive discriminatory activity as propounded by the fallacies; instead it is an inclusive liberal process.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSurum, J., & Kauka, E. O. The Fallacies of the Professional Educators (Philosophical & Psychological Perspectives).en_US
dc.identifier.issn2454-6186
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir-library.kabianga.ac.ke/handle/123456789/671
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS)en_US
dc.subjectFallaciesen_US
dc.subjectProfessional Educatorsen_US
dc.titleThe Fallacies of the Professional Educators (Philosophical & Psychological Perspectives)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The Fallacies.pdf
Size:
388.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full Paper

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: